Admin Saovaluck wrote on 19
th Aug, 2010 at 1:29am:
I won't run for President but thank you for your support. I'm happy with the current situation and I support anyone who is elected as the President of Laos.
There must be at least two parties for an election to occur, and allow Lao citizens to vote. We only have one party in Laos, so therefore only members of the National Assembly can vote for the person to lead the country.
The Lao Royal Family and the current party don't get along with each other, so bringing them back will result in trading accusations, finger pointing and even war. If there is an opposition party or parties in the future, the Royal Family won't be one of those parties.
One political party system, corruption is a problem in Laos. Again "absolute power corrupt." There is no check and balance of power. No freedom of speech. Nobody can speak about the corruption, no freedom of press and information. No media can report on any wrong, so corruption go on and on. I just don't trust Vietnam advisors 100%. After thirty year. I think they are doing a bad jobs and most or all should be fire and deport back to Vietnam in my opinion.
LP Admins. I think we need first Laos women president. There is alway new leader, new Lao generation willing to step up if giving opportunity. Laos has many, many best and the brightest too. Government should give young Lao in Laos, Lao oversea a chance. I am find with it if Lao Royal Family are ban from politics in Laos in my opinion. But Laos government should allow multi-party, and opposition to raise their voice and see what they has to offer. I understand it will take time.
US current political system take over 200 year to reach this level and it still not perfect, but very good in my book. I don't called it 100% Capitalist. I called it Capitalist Socialist because they favorite not just the elite and big corporation, but also poor and working class. Most American are middle class. Most citizens benefits from the system. They did pretty good jobs distributing the wealth. Some people are called low income here, but poor people in the US get subsidy for housing, have car to drive, assistant with medicare, food, education and so on. That is why I called it Capitalist Socialist. Not imperial Capitalist.